-
Website
http://menstrualpoetry.com/ -
Original page
http://menstrualpoetry.com/purity-and-integrityballs -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ghostlove
6 comments · 1 points
-
Kelly (Raven) G.
8 comments · 3 points
-
dotlizard
14 comments · 5 points
-
tinkapuss
12 comments · 4 points
-
PiixiiDustt
7 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Your Holiday Kitty Feel-Good
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
Winter Skin Blues
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
Happy (Day Late) Thanksgiving!
3 weeks ago · 19 comments
-
Love Conquers Hate and Together We Have Strength
3 weeks ago · 6 comments
-
Your Holiday Kitty Feel-Good
blogberry mom,
First, can you tell me why, exactly, that "virginity is divine"? Given that the couple is using protection (and assuming they are heterosexual), two things happen to the woman when she has sex for the first time: One, a membrane, the hymen, breaks; and two, she gains an experience. Now, I'm a male, but I don't think any of those are actually doing any harm.
It's interesting how you said virginity "should only be given to your husband", too. What about the man? Hell, what about queer couples? Are they exempt from this "virginity is divine", stuff?
Also, virginity is a HUGE issue. That's why you have things like abstinence-only education and purity balls. And what is this "real meaning of 'virgin'"? Conventional wisdom tells me the meaning of a virgin is a person who has never had sex. What is this "real" meaning I'm failing to grasp?
Finally, why is premarital sex such a big deal? I will probably never support the patriarchal institution of marriage, so does that make me a bad person when I have sex? Tell me what's more sad: women having the option to do as they wish, or forcing traditional gender roles down their throats.
I agree. You can teach your children values and *integrity* without making them promise to keep their virginity until marriage... and at a BALL nonetheless! That's just a *bit* over the top.
"Integrity" makes much more sense. ;)
p.s. Love the new look. I hope you're doing well!
Blogberry Mom, Please wake up. abstinence should not be shoved down the throats of our youth, it leads to more teenage pregnancies and STDs because they have no idea what they are doing.
-Bethany
Why should any young woman want to 'save herself' for a husband that she will never fully know until she trys?
What do you do if you find that actually, you're really not sexually compatible -- but joined for life?
Oops - I forgot.
it's not meant to be about the woman's pleasure, is it?
So tell me again why I'd want to be a virgin waiting for her husband to appear?
p.s - I use the pill, too. AND I've used emergency contraception.
Damn, since I'm having sex responsibly and, y'know, NOT bringing another (unwanted) life into the world, I really must be going to hell now, mustn't I?
Churches are the most ignorant thing one can become involved with !
Pushing sexual "purity" on children at too early an age can only lead to a much too early curiosity about sex!
Yes, I'd say the fathers who participate are creepy.
Worse yet though are the Ministers who promote this kind of stuff ! James
Thanks for the well raised opinion Derek.
Keeping one's sexuality to oneself until one chooses to marry is a personal decision and not for everyone. But this father-daughter thing is creeeeeepy. Shouldn't Mom be handling that one, and Dad teaching the boys?
Don't even get me started on the practice of ramming your religion down a kid's throat--or any other part of them...
Nothing's better than the warm touch of a... woman before marriage. lol
-yes to the fathers being creepy.
-yes to the ministers being creepy.
But what's wrong with curiosity about sex?
I used to babysit children of 6 and 7 who would ask me about sex.
Actually, come to think of it, as a 7 year old, *I* was curious about sex.
I don't think it's a bad thing to wonder what those funny-shaped bits of your body do, or where babies come from. I'd say that's fairly reasonable, actually.
What I *don't* think is reasonable is telling a little girl who's really too young to understand fully that if she has sex before marriage, she'll become the human equivalent of a "used car", complete with "steering problems". Charming.
Just the other day I heard a youth preacher say, "If she'll do it with you, she's not worth having anyway." Cause she's a whore if she does it? He's still "worth having" but she's a whore.
Why hasn't this changed?
Thanks for the article.
If the girl has sex before marriage, she risks not having the correct information (sex and STD ed) and therefore possibly unpleasant results, in addition to the damnation of her own father OR she rushes into marriage before she's mature enough (around 30) to have that coveted sex, resulting in divorce or single parenthood.
Sure something positive could happen from this vow, but since the teen birth rates are rising for the first time in 15 years, there's a very good chance something negative could happen, too.
-The Scott
And it has nothing to do with abstinence-only education vs. sex ed and all that American political jargon. If had a kid I would protect them, and try whatever kind of crazy ball or party or ceremony to do that. Not because they are a girl who is thought to be weak...no that's not it or because they are a boy who is some wild beast who will attack women mindlessly...but because they are my children, with feelings that are precious trying to build a solid married life and treat their bodies to only the BEST.