Geee thanks for the link. You know, you were so nice to have posted it here because in all of my reading and research I never did think of going to Wikipedia. Seriously, Joel, how did you know? You read my mind, it's great, thank you for that!
In all seriousness now, getting any historical information (and I mean ANY) from Wikipedia is the same as opening a high school history text book--It is text taken from other historical books that have passed standards and will show in future text books. In other words, right-wing LIES LIES LIES. "Let's make America look good; it has to look good and the history books must reflect that so we can brainwash the next generation of sheep." So yeah, thanks, but you can take your propaganda and go sulk in the corner.
Joel_101
· 1 year ago
Here are some more diverse links –right-center-left
What exactly is the Bush doctrine? Those references in Wikipedia existed before Palin was interviewed. Unless of course there is a conspiracy to define that doctrine that has lasted for almost 7 years and has involved left/right media sources and many authors.
I do not consider myself right or left. I don’t make decisions based upon any party or that parties views. Nor do I base my decisions on the spew that comes forth from much of mass media and biased blogs on the internet. I am an equal opportunity questioner of all things and when I see someone being trampled unfairly, I usually say something. That includes defending you and your right to have and voice your opinion.
As for propaganda, what was this original post about?
You seem to have no problem slinging propaganda that you agree with, but when a different view, opinion, or thought provoking statement is made that is contrary to your own, it is wrong because you do not agree with it.
I do not sulk and quite frankly I thought you were bigger, better, and more intelligent than that.
Pete
· 1 year ago
No offense but his is exactly what needs to stop.. The arguing. I do wish that points can be made that are only factual and not opinionated. We the US lives off opinions and I'd say more than 95% of the population bases their decisions off of their friends views or family views. It's part of the American way to have opinions but we are not very good at listening first before making those opinions. I'd like to see the UNITED States become united in the right way, through hard work and support to one another.
One way to look at history books is they are JUST books. They are blogs basically/ opinions written down on paper not on computers, so that makes them no different than Wiki too. There is some factual info there, but we need a place for real answers. Especially now.
Diwali Sms
· 1 year ago
Obviously, a lot of info was wrong. However, a year before the "pre-emptive strike" I saw a CIA satellite photo that showed very clearly massive amounts of WMDs in Iraq. After the warnings, and the 1st Gulf War, those weapons were missing from that same spot. Where did they go? Were they used on Israel during that attack? Were they used on Hussein's own people? Were they buried in the sand in the vast desert? This dictator was clearly a menace. As Palin put it, though, mistakes were made. This was something that one country, alone, could not handle, obviously. We needed allies to strengthen it, but they wimped out. So there you have it. Yes, there was a threat, but if we dig our heads deep enough into the sand, maybe it will all go away by itself.
messagesandsms
· 1 week ago
i think i cant understand this article its out of my mind because politics are always out of my mind.
All Comments
In all seriousness now, getting any historical information (and I mean ANY) from Wikipedia is the same as opening a high school history text book--It is text taken from other historical books that have passed standards and will show in future text books. In other words, right-wing LIES LIES LIES. "Let's make America look good; it has to look good and the history books must reflect that so we can brainwash the next generation of sheep." So yeah, thanks, but you can take your propaganda and go sulk in the corner.
http://zfacts.com/p/677.html
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bush...
http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2...
http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/0001...
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/the_new_bush_d...
http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2006/12diplom...
http://www.slate.com/id/2200090/
http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/BushDoctrin...
What exactly is the Bush doctrine? Those references in Wikipedia existed before Palin was interviewed. Unless of course there is a conspiracy to define that doctrine that has lasted for almost 7 years and has involved left/right media sources and many authors.
I do not consider myself right or left. I don’t make decisions based upon any party or that parties views. Nor do I base my decisions on the spew that comes forth from much of mass media and biased blogs on the internet. I am an equal opportunity questioner of all things and when I see someone being trampled unfairly, I usually say something. That includes defending you and your right to have and voice your opinion.
As for propaganda, what was this original post about?
You seem to have no problem slinging propaganda that you agree with, but when a different view, opinion, or thought provoking statement is made that is contrary to your own, it is wrong because you do not agree with it.
I do not sulk and quite frankly I thought you were bigger, better, and more intelligent than that.
I'd like to see the UNITED States become united in the right way, through hard work and support to one another.
One way to look at history books is they are JUST books. They are blogs basically/ opinions written down on paper not on computers, so that makes them no different than Wiki too. There is some factual info there, but we need a place for real answers. Especially now.
Funny SMS
http://www.riderwear.net/