-
Website
http://menstrualpoetry.com/ -
Original page
http://menstrualpoetry.com/bloggers-unite-same-sex-marriage -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ghostlove
6 comments · 1 points
-
Kelly (Raven) G.
8 comments · 3 points
-
dotlizard
14 comments · 5 points
-
tinkapuss
12 comments · 4 points
-
PiixiiDustt
7 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Your Holiday Kitty Feel-Good
1 week ago · 7 comments
-
Winter Skin Blues
1 week ago · 7 comments
-
Happy (Day Late) Thanksgiving!
3 weeks ago · 19 comments
-
Love Conquers Hate and Together We Have Strength
3 weeks ago · 7 comments
-
Your Holiday Kitty Feel-Good
What I will say, as a defender of the constitution, this choice should always be left up to each state. I do not believe this is an issue that should be decided or even put in to our federal constitution or decided at a federal court level. This is a state issue and should be decided within each state by the citizens of each state.
However, living in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriages, regardless of where these individuals move to outside of California, unless it is to Massachusettes, they will not be able to obtain benefits and will be subject to the laws of the other states. Essentially, if they want their so-called marriages recognized, they are practically imprisoned and confined to that state. Federal laws, i.e, HIPAA Privacy, IRS, Social Security, Medicare, etc - will not recognize these marriages either.
Also - it has EVERYTHING to do with being a liberal. Conservatives do not think this way..so..ergo..duh..it is a liberal way of thinking - you might want to look up the definition of liberal versus conservative. The problem with two people having the same sexual organs who want to "conjunct" as you put it is a perversion, it's un-natural, and its immoral. The problem is that there is a congenital defect at birth where there is an abnormal hormonal imbalance. Rather than treat it medically, people like you have accepted it as natural rather than correct it medically as with all other congenital defects that are treatable.
The problem is that it is not "politically correct" for medical practitioners to speak out, yet there is plenty of peer reviewed studies and documentation that proves what I have stated. It is a liberal agenda to allow this to continue rather than do what is right for these people to lead normal lives by providing them the medical treatment they need rather than allow them to continue this way. The APA was forced to remove homosexuality from the DSM-III because of political pressure - but - the APA still feels it is a medical and psychological condition that is treatable.
That, to me, is the mental illness, and "people like you" have "accepted it as natural" and think it's the normal way to be.
I'm perfectly natural- a human being like everyone else, and not evil, and certainly not mentally ill. (By the way, we've been around since recorded history, and we haven't eaten all your babies and ass-raped your pets so far). And if, as you say, the APA still feels that all gay folks are crazy and that it's reversible... cite your sources. Tell me where the APA specifically states that. 'Cause I think you made that up.
You freakin' panty-sniffers are more concerned with checking genitals and sticking your noses into bedrooms of consenting adults around the country than letting its citizens- ALL of them- lead normal lives. On their own. Without your input.
A#&hole.
"there is plenty of peer reviewed studies and documentation that proves what I have stated."
I would like to read these "studies".
You're a sick person bobo.
-Kris