<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Menstrual Poetry - Latest Comments in Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.disqus.com/</link><description>Pissing people off in the name of changing the world since 2007.</description><atom:link href="https://menstrualpoetry.disqus.com/basic_quality_care_for_women_is_at_stake/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:25:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-63346276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes definitely Hillary should be the President of United States&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Recurrent Yeast Infections</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:25:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-45123691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.learn-quran-tutor.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.learn-quran-tutor.com/"&gt; Learn Quran online &lt;/a&gt;  at home is an excellent program that enable kids, adults &amp;amp; new muslims to Learn Quran. &lt;a href="http://HomeQuran.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="HomeQuran.com"&gt;HomeQuran.com&lt;/a&gt; have 24-7 classes. We have students in USA, Canada, UK, France, Australia, Spain, Ireland and all over the world. We teach 24 hours a day. You can try three FREE no obligation trial lessons to evaluate our online Quran learning service. After that you can decide to continue or discontinue Quran learning with us. We have both male and female tutors to teach Koran. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kids Quran</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-45123607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that you should talk about "blocking care for women".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kids Quran</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:37:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-4059954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hillary should be president =]&lt;br&gt;Obama sucks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">High School Musical 4</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2638536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that you should talk about "blocking care for women". While a serving as a Senator in the Illinois State Senate, Barack Obama voted FOUR TIMES against a bill comparable to the Federal "Born Alive Infant Protection Act", denying babies that survived botched abortions lifesaving medical treatment (they were often taken to a hospital utility closet where other "waste" was placed, and left their to die). NARAL didn't even oppose the bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many of those babies were little girls.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's only appropriate that Barack H. Obama be given the nickname "Barry the barbarian".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091607.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091607.html"&gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bumper Sticker Printing</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2515385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i sent in a letter!&lt;br&gt;Hillary should be president =]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2513665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bet Obama sure is upset now that he didn't pick Hilary Clinton for vice. I just don't see how he didn't think if had picked then he would have had the election in the bag.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Invisalign Braces Review</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2510625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sent a letter.  I can't understand the pro-life/anti-contraceptive agenda.  Pro-life or Pro-Choice the focus should always be, first and foremost, reducing the number of "unwanted" pregnancies by the most effective means possible.  At current the most effective way for a sexually active couple to avoid pregnancy is by using contraceptives consistently.  To cast out the abstinence blanket and just pray people lay down on it is irresponsible and ignorant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Sue</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2505912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll have to research - but if true - I will scream&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doctors are doctors - they are not supposed to have a choice once they take their oath - hmmm, have to check and see it there still is an oath...  That would be bad too&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jimbob-2729900</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic, Quality Care for Women is at Stake</title><link>http://menstrualpoetry.com/basic-quality-care-women-stake#comment-2505306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sent in my comment a couple weeks ago and got a form letter from my congressman stating that he's in favor of protecting the rights of women. Of course, then I moved. I think I have to send another letter now. &lt;br&gt;But yeah, I don't know anyone who thinks this proposal is a good idea. Whose lame idea WAS this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lemur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>